Suburban Nation: The Rise of Sprawl and the Decline of the American Dream | 
 enlarge | Authors: Andres Duany, Elizabeth Plater-zyberk, Jeff Speck
Publisher: North Point Press
Category: Book
List Price: $19.00
Buy Used: $7.20
You Save: $11.80 (62%)
New (35) Used (41) from $7.20
Avg. Customer Rating:  84 reviews
Sales Rank: 61724
Media: Paperback
Edition: 1st
Number Of Items: 1
Pages: 320
Shipping Weight (lbs): 1.4
Dimensions (in): 7.9 x 7.9 x 0.8
ISBN: 0865476063
Dewey Decimal Number: 725
EAN: 9780865476066
ASIN: 0865476063
Publication Date: April 16, 2001
Availability: Usually ships in 1-2 business days
Shipping: Expedited shipping available
Shipping: International shipping available
|
| Also Available In:
|
| Similar Items:
|
| Editorial Reviews:
Product Description
A manifesto by America's most controversial and celebrated town planners, proposing an alternative model for community design.
There is a growing movement in North America to put an end to suburban sprawl and to replace the automobile-based settlement patterns of the past fifty years with a return to more traditional planning principles. This movement stems not only from the realization that sprawl is ecologically and economically unsustainable but also from a growing awareness of sprawl's many victims: children, utterly dependent on parental transportation if they wish to escape the cul-de-sac; the elderly, warehoused in institutions once they lose their driver's licenses; the middle class, stuck in traffic for two or more hours each day.
Founders of the Congress for the New Urbanism, Andres Duany and Elizabeth Plater-Zyberk are at the forefront of this movement, and in Suburban Nation they assess sprawl's costs to society, be they ecological, economic, aesthetic, or social. It is a lively, thorough, critical lament, and an entertaining lesson on the distinctions between postwar suburbia-characterized by housing clusters, strip shopping centers, office parks, and parking lots-and the traditional neighborhoods that were built as a matter of course until mid-century. It is an indictment of the entire development community, including governments, for the fact that America no longer builds towns. Most important, though, it is that rare book that also offers solutions.
|
| Customer Reviews: Read 79 more reviews...
 A concise outline of how to create development to combat sprawl November 10, 2008
The authors do an excellent job of both outlining ways to develop that do not induce sprawl, promote neighborhoods, and encourage people to both create and live in places that are the antithesis of sprawl. I appreciated their anecdotes and stories about things that have worked, good ideas that failed, and bad ideas that failed in an epic manner.
They are clear to show examples of how unintended consequences have derailed previous idealistic methods of combating sprawl, as well as examples of how (typically their) ideas have successfully fought sprawl. Adding parking to streets - slows down traffic - makes the area livable again. Who would have thought!?
All in all, an excellent history of why we live in sprawl, how we can work against it, and a great book for developers and architects to understand that their business doesn't have to be all suburban office park & subdivision focused.
 A good intro to the problems of urban planning June 30, 2008
I really enjoyed the book. I gave it a 4 and I think it is very well deserved. Reading my review may lead you to think otherwise because there is a lot of sharp criticism of particular aspects of the book. Overall though, the book really points out the folly of suburban planning and it helped me better understand why I am leaving the suburbs for an urban lifestyle. There are some great insights that I don't think I would have ever heard anywhere else. For example, he attributes the fact that most streets are unwalkable to firetrucks. The fire chief has to have the biggest and best firetruck so the roads have to be built to accomodate that firetruck when it is traveling to an emergency so the roads are large enough to allow everyone to speed in even the most residential areas.
Like most of us, Duany is a one tool kind of carpenter. Since he only has a hammer, everything is a nail. Mr. Duany's hammer is Seaside, Florida which he thinks is the solution to every problem. For example, when I heard him speak concerning the revitalization of midtown Atlanta, his only criticism was the fact that there were only a few developers on Peachtree street and they were all building 20 to 35 story high-rise condominiums as opposed to much smaller developments such as townhouses. He ignored the fact that land costs on Peachtree Street would make a townhouse completely unaffordable. He also seemed to have missed the fact that one block off Peachtree Street in any direction there is an abundance of single-family housing, low-rise condominiums, townhouses, etc.
I get the impression that he doesn't understand that Seaside and many of his other developments are not economically sustainable. Seaside exists because people make money somewhere else, take it to Seaside and use it to pay for a little peace of nirvana. While Seaside is certainly a great place, it would be non-existent or a slum if people didn't invest money earned elsewhere. I know he has worked on many projects and many are filled with residents that live and work in what might be calles "real jobs" as opposed to a tourist economy. However, even in those environments, the economy is supported by people that wake up in one of his bedroom communities and commute to a real city to make money.
That's my complaint in a nutshell, however, if you want a basic overview of what is wrong with Suburban America and one of many ideas how to fix it, I encourage you to take a read. The one other comment I would have about his work is that he seems to advocate pre-war bungalow style architecture above and beyond every alternative. If that is what you are looking for great, however, it is completely lacking in innovation and would eventually drive me crazy. Seaside was featured in the Truman show for a reason, because it is sickeningly sweet and completely artificial just like all the other characters.
Good stuff....... April 28, 2008
Very well written. The book makes it very easy to understand why our towns and cities are set up like they are and why some are more livable than others.
I purchased this book about five years ago and often still think about the concepts that are explained inside.
I highly recommend it.
excellent, must read, but flawed April 18, 2008
1 out of 1 found this review helpful
One of the best books I've read this year. Lots of things that I've
noticed over the years about places I like and don't like were summarized
and expounded upon. I hadn't quite realized the effect traffic
engineering has had on city design.
I felt that it really elucidated a lot of why people are really unhappy
with their homes, lives, and communities.
This book is extensively footnoted with lots of data to back up opinions.
There is a huge bibliography into which I'm delving.
However, where it ventures into the social and political realm, it is
less effective and borders on being one-sided and polemic.
In one example, the authors state that GM and others
killed streetcars in 50 cities to get people to take cars rather
than public transport. If you look into this a little deeper, you'll
discover that it was probably more to promote their buses, and that the
truth was a lot more complicated than that. Look up "Great American
Streetcar Scandal" at wikipedia.
Read for General Interest November 11, 2007
This book was recommended by a friend, and since Mr. Duany has been to Sarasota (where I now live) as a consultant, I decided to read it out of general interest. I was pleasantly surprised how readable it was, and many of the concepts of community that I was exposed to as a child were presented. And most importantly, it explained my preferences in leisure vacation travel for the convenient, comfortable community destinations--whether they be in large cities or in nearly rural locations. It is good reading for anyone who is or will be affected by growth or redevelopment.
|
|
|
