Embedded Autonomy | 
enlarge | Author: Peter B. Evans Publisher: Princeton University Press Category: Book
List Price: $37.50 Buy New: $26.36 You Save: $11.14 (30%)
New (18) Used (14) from $23.00
Avg. Customer Rating: 3 reviews Sales Rank: 650761
Media: Paperback Number Of Items: 1 Pages: 336 Shipping Weight (lbs): 1.1 Dimensions (in): 9 x 6 x 0.9
ISBN: 0691037361 Dewey Decimal Number: 338.47004 EAN: 9780691037363 ASIN: 0691037361
Publication Date: February 17, 1995 Availability: Usually ships in 1-2 business days Shipping: International shipping available Condition: Brand New, Perfect Condition, Please allow 4-14 business days for delivery. 100% Money Back Guarantee, Over 1,000,000 customers served.
|
| Editorial Reviews:
Product Description In recent years, debate on the state's economic role has too often devolved into diatribes against intervention. Peter Evans questions such simplistic views, offering a new vision of why state involvement works in some cases and produces disasters in others. To illustrate, he looks at how state agencies, local entrepreneurs, and transnational corporations shaped the emergence of computer industries in Brazil, India, and Korea during the seventies and eighties. Evans starts with the idea that states vary in the way they are organized and tied to society. In some nations, like Zaire, the state is predatory, ruthlessly extracting and providing nothing of value in return. In others, like Korea, it is developmental, promoting industrial transformation. In still others, like Brazil and India, it is in between, sometimes helping, sometimes hindering. Evans's years of comparative research on the successes and failures of state involvement in the process of industrialization have here been crafted into a persuasive and entertaining work, which demonstrates that successful state action requires an understanding of its own limits, a realistic relationship to the global economy, and the combination of coherent internal organization and close links to society that Evans called "embedded autonomy."
|
| Customer Reviews:
It is worth reading August 6, 2005 1 out of 4 found this review helpful
The author analyzes how East Asian countries make their economic development successful with state autonomy and also tells the difference among those countries, which means that if other countries wants to copy the above models, they need to decide what model they could apply.
Outstanding book September 22, 2003 3 out of 4 found this review helpful
An excellent comparative study of efforts by developmental states in India, Brazil, and South Korea to break out of preordained "comparative advantage" and develop modern high-tech sectors for their respective economies. Based on extensive field research in all three countries and supplemented by thorough use of archival evidence.
The mechanism of developmental state September 25, 2002 4 out of 8 found this review helpful
This book is regarded as de facto classic in the tradition of developmental state. The strategy of developmental state is the denial of extant hierarchy of comparative advantage. To achieve high growth rate, there should be high return sectors. But such sectors, in general, have no relation with developing countries. Then, should developing countries rest with agriculture or labor-intensive industries? Not necessarily. Such sectors tend to be low value-added, in other words, with low growth prospect. If you dont have it, then make it! Its the strategy of developmental state. But its no more than what to do. There was not satisfactory conceptualization on how East Asian developmental state put that strategy into practice. Amsdens Asias Next Giant (reciprocity) and Evans this book marked some conceptual leapfrogging. In the tradition of developmental state, state intervention is pinpointed as a necessary factor to rapid industrialization in East Asian countries. This book elaborates what states did to promote the industrial transformation (or, in Porters word, achieve competitive advantage). Evans argues that embedded autonomy (networking between bureaucrats and business) was the key to the developmental states effectiveness. What define the developmental state are the state autonomy (or strong state in the jargon of political science) and the state capacity. The state autonomy refers to the insulation of the bureaucracy from particularistic interests of, for example, the labor, the landlord, civil society, or the business. But a state that was only autonomous would lack both sources of intelligence and the ability to implement its strategy. But the state that is only embedded is ready for capture. Only when embeddedness and autonomy are joined together can a state be called developmental. Evans takes real world example, to support his conception, from history of IT sector in South Korea. IT sectors of India and Brazil are taken together. But latters are mobilized to contrast Koreas against them.
|
|
|